Manufactured Gas Plants
Before natural gas was widely
available, gas for heating homes, lighting streets, and cooking was
manufactured from coal and other materials. These "manufactured gas
plants" (or "MGPs") were miracles of engineering--even to
this day, the same kinds of technologies are often touted as ways to
convert coal into clean-burning gaseous fuel.
Unfortunately, though, when natural gas was made widely available,
mostly during the period from 1930 to 1950, the old MGPs were often
decommissioned and abandoned in place--leaving the residues of these
operations (including coal tar and other potentially harmful
substances) bured in the ground.
The environmental challenges of abandoned MGP sites did not begin to be
recognized by utilities, municipal governments, and corporations until
the 1980s. Over the two decades since then, and nearly three dozen MGP
sites later, the attorneys now at Kazmarek Geiger & Laseter
have developed innovative legal and economic tools that cover a wide
array of litigation, transactional, and regulatory solutions to the MGP
problem.
Litigation
Representing clients in both plaintiff and defendant roles, KGL
attorneys have handled private cost recovery lawsuits, insurance
coverage disputes, toxic tort claims, toxic torts, and common law
property damage claims. Notewothy matters in which KGL attorneys have
representated major clients include:
- We
represented a major utility in a toxic tort class action lawsuit with
potentially dramatic political overtones. By combining a vigorous
litigation strategy with an innovative settlement alternative, all
claims were resolved favorably to the client out of court.
- We filed
suit against a number of insurance carriers for a utility client
seeking coverage for cleanup costs at more than a dozen sites. After
five years of hard-fought litigation, the client secured tens of
millions of dollars in recoveries after all costs.
- Capitalizing
on a cost-recovery lawsuit, we were able to develop extensive evidence
of participation by other potentially responsible parties. This, in
turn, led to a multi-party settlement with the EPA and a greatly
reduced cost to the clients.
Transactional
The KGL attorneys' earliest exposure to MGP sites arose in the context
of corporate transactions where we recognized the risks posed by the
acquisition targets' historical onnection to the industry. Through the
ocurse of this work and dozens of subsequent transactions, we developed
a stable of legal and economic tools that have allowed deals to proceed
despite significant potential liabilities. Building on this base, our
experience with transactional work has grown to include "brownfield"
redevelopments, liability transfers, strategic reacquisitions,
corporate mergers, and urban renewal projects. Representative matters
include:
- We
facilitated a pre-remediation sale of an MGP site located in an urban
historic district, which addressed an extensive array of contractual
and regulatory complexities. Then, just before closing, we restructed
the transaction to substitute parties and use the state's new
brownfield law, immunizing the purchasers against further obligations,
and in the process easing the burden on our client of future indemnity
obligations. The deal closed with a multi-million dollar profit for the
client.
- On behalf of
a utility client sued by the current owner of a former MGP site, we
orchestrated the acquisition of a defaulted first mortgage, foreclosed
on the property, thereby addressing claims relating to alleged
dimunition in property value, and then used this rearrangement to
structure a very favorable settlement. We then assisted the client in
designing a cleanup based on future commercial reuse, allowing the
client to resell the property subject to restrictive covenants at a
substantial profit over the acquisition costs.
- Because
former MGP sites are often located in the heart of urban core areas, we
have developed a holistic approach to ensure reuse of the properties
that benefits the public and is economically beneficial to the client.
For example, in one instance, a site included not only the former MGP,
but also a former city-owned landfill, a railroad, a lumber yard, and a
river. Further complicating matters, the site was located within the
boundaries of a major urban redevelopment zone. With sensitivity to the
political interests and the timing of various funding options, we
coordinated these competing interests to produce a site-wide cleanup
strategy, the cost of which was very favorable to the client.
Regulatory
For more than 20 years, the KGL attorneys have counseled clients as
they have navigated the complex regulatory shoals governing MGP sites.
What we have found in our involvement with dozens of regulatory
negotiations is that EPA and its state counterpartsl have developed a
number
of conventions for dealing with MGP sites. Often, those
conventions are not always effective or cost-effective when it comes to
the peculiar challenges of addressing sites that often operated for
more than 100 years, with essentially no environmental controls, and
then were abandoned in place 50 to 90 years ago. Our approach to
dealing with regualtors on these sites recognizes these unique
complications. Among our experiences are the following.
- We
represented a client confronted with the redevelopment of a waterfront
MGP site into a luxury marina and mixed-use complex. We handled not
only the state and federal cleanup requirements, but also the wetland
issues, in-stream impacts, and claims for NRD.
- On behalf of
a municipal clients in New England, we negotiated a memorandum of
understanding with the state environmental agency to conduct a joint
investigation of more than ten acres impacted sediment on the bottom of
the river that passes through the heart of town.
- For many
clients, we have addressed the special problems created by the
locations of MGPs along waterways. MGP impacts in such areas
necessitate not only costly cleanups of difficult media, but also
numerous regulatory complexities involving "ecotoxicity" assessments
and criteria, multiple agencies with overlapping jurisdictions, and
complicated permitting requirements. The KGL attorneys have been
successful in minimizing both the cost and the complications inherent
in these difficult circumstances.
Corporate
Our extensive experience as outside counsel to publicly traded
companies has given the KGL attorneys unique insights into counseling
corporate clients regarding the important corporate issues raised by
MGP legacies. Of special significant, our accomplishments include:
- Among the
most challenging requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance are those
covering environmental cost disclosure controls in general, and
controls for disclosure of MGP costs in particular. We have developed a
comprehenxive mechanism to address these requirements, one of the first
to be subjected to extensive outside review and confirmation.
- We assisted
one client in outsourcing the entire in-house MGP program to an
experienced outside MGP consulting firm.
- While a
vigorous defense to litigation can be essential, a better course is
often found in avoiding litigation altogether, which can
require a substantial deviations from normal legal and corporate
reaction to threatened claims. For example, in one community where a
disastrous dispute seemed inevitable, we assited the client in totally
revamping the corporate strategy, leading to a very aggressive
community relations plan, legally prudent acknowledgement of the
presence of impacts, an aggressive cleanup program, appropriate
compensation to landowners for legitimate losses, along with other such
measures. Incredibly, the net result of the program was that the
client's standing in the communicy was actually enhanced, costly
lawsuits were avoided, and the cleanup was actually managed to a degree
that the company saved money in the process
Ultimately, what all this means is that we believe we can offer our clients an approach to management of former MGPs that few other firms can match. We would be please to discuss our capabilities in more detail -- just click here and we'll be back in touch promptly.
Page last updated:
25 Jan 2008